Improving Prison Environments Through Peer-Led Activities

Introduction

Prisons are often harsh environments where individuals face boredom, isolation, and emotional distress. Traditional prison systems focus heavily on security and punishment, leaving little room for inmates to engage in meaningful activities. However, recent research suggests that providing structured, peer-led activities can lead to significant improvements in behavior and well-being.

A 2024 study by Seel, May, and Austin examined the impact of peer-led, trauma-informed activities in a Category B UK prison. Their findings highlight the potential of prisoner-run initiatives to reduce misconduct and improve daily life behind bars (Seel et al., 2024). This blog post explores the key takeaways from their research and what it means for behavior analysts working in correctional settings.

The Challenge of Traditional Prison Structures

Incarcerated individuals often experience environments with:

Severe restrictions on movement and activities.
High boredom levels, leading to frustration and misconduct.
A history of trauma, making them vulnerable to stress and emotional distress.

Studies have shown that restrictive prison settings can increase aggression, self-harm, and other behavioral issues. Without engagement in meaningful activities, many prisoners struggle to cope, leading to negative cycles of behavior.

The Importance of Trauma-Informed Care (TIC)

Recognizing the effects of trauma is critical for designing interventions that improve prisoner well-being. Trauma-informed care (TIC) emphasizes:

Safety – Creating a supportive environment that minimizes threats and fear.
Empowerment – Allowing individuals to make choices and engage in self-improvement.
Skill-Building – Providing constructive outlets for learning and socializing.

By incorporating TIC principles into prison programs, institutions can help reduce stress and promote positive behavioral change.

The Study: Peer-Led Activity Programs in a UK Prison

Study Setting and Design

The study took place in a Category B UK prison, which houses individuals who are not considered the highest-security risk but still require strict controls. The researchers introduced a peer-led activity program to assess whether giving prisoners meaningful, noncontingent activities would lead to improvements in behavior and mental well-being.

How the Peer-Led Program Worked

The program focused on:

Prisoner-selected activities, ensuring relevance and engagement.
Noncontingent participation, meaning attendance was not based on behavior control.
Peer mentorship, where selected prisoners led sessions for their fellow inmates.

Activities included educational workshops, creative projects, and structured discussions. Participation was voluntary, and the goal was to create an engaging, constructive space within the prison.

Data Collection and Measures

The researchers used multiple methods to assess the program's impact:

Prisoner and staff surveys to gauge perceptions of the program.
Observation of engagement levels during activities.
Institutional behavior records to track changes in misconduct and self-harm incidents.

Key Findings: The Impact of Peer-Led Activities

1. Increased Participation and Engagement

Prisoners actively attended and participated in the peer-led activities. The most popular sessions included:

Creative and hobby-based activities such as art and music.
Educational workshops, particularly those related to self-improvement.
Group discussions, fostering social connections and peer support.

Participation was voluntary, yet many inmates chose to engage regularly, showing sustained interest in the program.

Prisoners reported several psychological and emotional benefits, including:

Improved mood and reduced stress, particularly among those with trauma histories.
A sense of purpose, with many stating they felt more motivated and engaged in daily life.
Stronger peer relationships, as the program fostered a sense of community.

For some individuals, the program provided a valuable coping mechanism inside the restrictive prison setting.

3. Mixed Staff Reactions

Prison staff had divided opinions on the program’s effectiveness. While some acknowledged its benefits, others were skeptical about the peer-led model, expressing concerns that:

Prisoners might not reliably maintain structure in the sessions.
The program might not sufficiently impact overall prison behavior.
Traditional security concerns could arise from increased prisoner collaboration.

However, institutional records indicated no increase in security incidents related to the program, suggesting that these concerns may be overstated.

What This Means for Behavior Analysts

For behavior analysts working in correctional settings, this study offers valuable insights:

1. Environmental Enrichment Can Influence Behavior

Structured, noncontingent activities can help shift behavior patterns by reducing boredom and frustration. Making these activities voluntary and meaningful encourages sustained engagement.

2. Peer-Led Interventions Can Be Effective

Empowering prisoners to take an active role in their own rehabilitation can increase participation and accountability. Selecting appropriate peer leaders and providing clear guidelines are critical to success.

3. Trauma-Informed Approaches Should Be Prioritized

Recognizing trauma histories and addressing emotional needs can improve prisoner well-being. Designing interventions with safety, empowerment, and skill-building in mind can lead to better outcomes.

Conclusion: The Future of Peer-Led Prison Programs

Seel et al.'s study highlights the potential of peer-led, trauma-informed activities in restrictive prison environments. By integrating these programs into correctional settings, institutions may:

Reduce misconduct and self-harm incidents by offering constructive outlets.
Improve prisoner well-being, fostering resilience and skill development.
Encourage social support and positive peer interactions, strengthening rehabilitation efforts.

While challenges remain—especially regarding staff perceptions and institutional constraints—this study provides a promising foundation for further research and implementation.

Call to Action for Behavior Analysts

If you work in correctional settings or behavioral health, consider how structured, peer-led activities could enhance your intervention strategies. To learn more, read the full study:

📖Seel, C. J., May, R. J., & Austin, J. L. (2024). "Evaluating Peer-Led Activities in a UK Prison." Behavior Analysis in Practice, 17, 679-692. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-023-00851-8.

AI Research Assistant

See Full Bio